Tuesday, June 2, 2009

Part 2 of Taxes, Chemistry, and Advertising

A quick review from part I. Sweetener consumption in the the US has increased in the last 20 years. So has the obesity rate. HFCS has essentially the same make-up as table sugar (sucrose)--that means both have similar amounts of fructose and glucose.

So, scientists and doctors observed the trends. They noticed that our drinks are bigger, our intake of processed foods is greater and obesity and heart disease are bigger problems. They followed the scientific process and made some hypotheses. They published studies in medical journals. What has filtered down to us is a general idea that HCFS is really bad for us, but the average shopper has no idea why.

To understand the demonization of HFCS, you need to know more about fructose. First, our intake of fructose is increasing. Barry Popkin, PhD, and George Bray, MD, used data from the federal government and determined that Americans consumed 158.5 calories of fructose in 1970. They also reported that we consumed 228 calories from fructose in 1995---a 30% increase.

Second, you need to know a bit about the differences in how our bodies use fructose and glucose. The glucose part of sugar is our basic building block for energy. Starch is broken down into glucose. Fructose is the sugar found in fruit. The two molecules are not used in our body in the same way. Fructose does not trigger the pancreas to make insulin, and it does not enter the blood stream. Glucose does. Our bodies can use less fructose than glucose. If you consume your maximum amount of fructose, the body will start converting the excess into triglycerides (fat), which over time will lead to health issues and obesity. Glucose (the sugar component of all starches) feeds muscle cells. It does not get converted into fat molecules.

Studies make it pretty clear that fructose is a large player in the obesity epidemic but glucose is more of a bench warmer. Reliable, published studies indicate that diets with glucose as the main sweetener seem to have no measurable ill-effects. Diets with fructose as the main sweetener appear to induce lepitin resistance. Lepitin helps to keep weight in check. Multiple studies confirm this idea. And excess fat, leads to all kinds of other health issues. There are other studies linking diets high in fructose to increased levels of uric acid. High levels of uric acid can lead to heart disease, artery inflammation, kidney disease, stroke and more. But whether uric acid is really the cause is still debatable. (The uric acid link is the focus of the book The Sugar Fix: The High Fructose Fallout that is Making You Fat and Sick, by Richard Johnson, MD)

We are fatter. We eat more high fructose corn syrup. We eat more sugar. Fructose can be really bad for you. We eat more fructose than we did in the past. The use of HFCS has increased, partially due to government interference. All true statements. So should you avoid HFCS?

Perhaps it is HFCS that is causing us to eat more fructose since we eat more processed foods and since HFCS is so affordable, manufacturers have added it to all kinds of food to make us love them more. Perhaps. But HFCS is too similar to sugar for me to buy this hypothesis. I think we just need to consume less sugar. Period.

HFCS isn't worse for our health than sugar as far as the current studies indicate. There are, of course, many more studies out there. And the corn grower's association has a fascinating ad campaign to tell you why HFCS is good and natural. Their website is full of studies supporting their case, but I didn't mention those studies. They don't add to the argument much and CBS news did their research and found several of the studies to be funded by industries with a stake in the outcome. Really, more independent research needs to be done.

So....I won't recommend avoiding all HCFS because it is worse than sugar--there is no conclusive evidence to warrant such a stance. There might be a different reason to avoid it though, depending on your food convictions..but that's part 3.

sources: http://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=93621
Goldstein, Jennifer. "High Fructose Corn Syrup" in May 2009 issue of Prevention.
Johnson, Richard and Timothy Gower. The Sugar Fix: The High Fructose Fallout that is Making You Fat and Sick. Published in 2008 by Rodale.

http://diabetes.webmd.com/news/20070625/fructose-sugars-dark-side,
http://blogs.webmd.com/healthy-recipe-doctor/2008/01/high-fructose-corn-syrup-new-bad-boy-in.html
http://www.askmen.com/sports/foodcourt_150/182_eating_well.html

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 86 (2007):899-906. American Society for Nutrition.
http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/trends.html

www.sweetsurprise.com

3 comments:

  1. POp is one of the worst things (I think anyway) I still want more and still feel thirsty after I drink it. I have been really looking at the labels lately HFCS is in EVERYTHING! I can't wait to make strawberry jelly this year with white sugar and to use less sugar than I used in it last year!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I am going to rant for a minute.
    I really HATE that wherever I go, people are doling out candy to my kids. School, church, wherever I am NOT with them at all times. Like people are doing me a favor that they are giving the kids "treats". I want to scream.

    And as a hygienist do you know how many 2 year olds I have seen with tooth decay? It is absolutely ridiculous. There is NO reason for a kid to be carting around a sippy cup full of kool-aid 24-7. SUGAR IS EVERYWHERE!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Kara--
    Amen. But you're preaching to the choir.

    ReplyDelete